
When I was a senior at McDaniel College, Chakaia Booker came to give an Artist Talk. Her work is unique, interesting, and I identified with her. She does sculpture with an unusual material and that was my focus at the time.
It’s a question that has continued to bother me for some time now. It’s her idea, her concept, but a team of assistants are physically putting the pieces together… not her.
Researchers/Scientists do the same thing. An undergrad on their team will break the code, but because the researcher is advising their name goes on it.
Do you think that is fair?
I’m truly perplexed. As a cosmetologist I know what it is to be an assistant. When I was still in school for cosmetology, I was a shampoo assistant for a few months. The assistant does literally all the work. The stylist only touches up the head at the end; plucks a few curls out here and there, and sends the person on their way. Here’s the clincher, the assistant gets maybe a five dollar tip, but the stylist $65 and the recognition.
Having been in that position I don’t think you should get to call something your work (exclusively) if you only oversee. I don’t care how busy you are, or how large the demand for your work is.
I’m too big of a control freak to ever let that happen. As a stylist, I rarely use the assistants I have access to. If I’m able, I’ll do it. As an artist, I’ve never even dreamed about having another person assist me in anything other than an opinion. Art is too personal for extra hands.
What do you guys think?






